Torture is the infliction of severe physical or psychological
pain or grief as an expression of cruelty, a means of intimidation,
deterrent, revenge or punishment, or as a tool for the extraction of
information or confessions.
Torture is almost universally considered to be an extreme
violation of human rights, as stated by the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. Signatories of the Third Geneva Convention and Fourth
Geneva Convention agree not to torture protected persons (enemy
civilians and POWs) in armed conflicts, and signatories of the UN
Convention Against Torture agree not to intentionally inflict severe
pain or suffering on anyone, to obtain information or a confession, to
punish them, or to coerce them or a third person. These conventions and
agreements notwithstanding, it is estimated by organisations such as
Amnesty International that around 2/3 of countries do not consistently
abide by the spirit of such treaties.
Current legal status of torture
On December 10, 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was
adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. Article 5 states "
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".
Since that time the use of torture has been regulated by a number
of international treaties, of which the two major ones are the United
Nations Convention Against Torture and the Geneva Conventions.
As of November 5, 2005: US Congress is considering attaching
Senator John McCain's amendment banning torture to the 2006 Defense
appropriations bill. The amendment would ensure an end to the U.S. use
of torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, and extraordinary
rendition, which have become common practice since September 11,
2001. However, Vice President Dick Cheney and other Republicans are asking for exemptions for the CIA in the torture ban.
United Nations Convention Against Torture
The United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) came into force
in June 1987. The most relevant articles are articles 1, 2, 3 and the
first paragraph of article 16.
- Article 1
- 1. Any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether
physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such
purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a
confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed
or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a
third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind,
when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or
with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person
acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering
arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.
- 2. This article is without prejudice to any international
instrument or national legislation which does or may contain provisions
of wider application.
- Article 2
- 1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative,
administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in
any territory under its jurisdiction.
- 2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state
of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other
public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.
- 3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.
- Article 3
- 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or
extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds
for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
- 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such
grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant
considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State
concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations
of human rights.
- Article 16
- 1. Each State Party shall undertake to prevent in any
territory under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment which do not amount to torture as
defined in article I, when such acts are committed by or at the
instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official
or other person acting in an official capacity. In particular, the
obligations contained in articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 shall apply with the
substitution for references to torture of references to other forms of
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
There are several points which should be noted:
- Section 1: torture is defined as severe pain or suffering,
which means there exist levels of pain and suffering which are not
severe enough to be called torture. Discussions on this area of
international law are influenced by a ruling of the European Court of
Human Rights(ECHR).
- Section 2: If a state has signed the treaty without reservations, then there are no exceptional circumstances whatsoever
where a state can use torture and not break its treaty obligations.
However the worst sanction which can be applied to a powerful country is
a public record that they have broken their treaty obligations. In
certain exceptional cases the authorities in those countries may
consider that, with plausible deniability, this is an acceptable risk to
take as the definition of severe is open to interpretation.
- Section 16: contains the phrase territory under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,
so if the government of a state authorises its personnel to use sensory
deprivation on a detainee in territory not under its jurisdiction then
it has not broken its treaty obligations.
At the moment this treaty has been signed by about half the countries in the world.
Geneva Conventions
The four Geneva Conventions provide protection for people who fall
into enemy hands. They envisage war in its traditional form, whereby
people in uniforms fight clearly defined enemies in uniform, within a
clearly defined arena. It therefore divides people into two explicit
groups: combatants and non-combatants (civilians). There is a third
group whose existence is implied, but whose treatment is not covered in
detail. These are unlawful combatants, such as spies, Mercenary and
other combatants who have broken the laws of war, for example by firing
on an enemy while flying a white flag. Whilst combatants and
non-combatants are provided substantial protection, a lesser level of
protection is afforded to unlawful combatants.
The third Geneva Convention (GCIII) and fourth Geneva
Convention(GCIV) Geneva Conventions are the two most relevant for the
treatment of the victims of conflicts. Both treaties state in their
similarly worded article 3 that in a
non-international armed conflict that "
Persons
taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed
forces who have laid down their arms... shall in all circumstances be
treated humanely and that there must not be any "
violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture." or "
outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment".
Under GCIV most enemy civilians in an
international armed conflict
will be "Protected Persons" under the meaning of GCIV, (see exemptions
section immediately after this for those who aree 32, protected persons
have the right to protection from
"murder, torture, corporal
punishments, mutilation and medical or scientific experiments...but also
to any other measures of brutality whether applied by non-combatant or
military agents."
The treatment of prisoners of war (POWs) in an
international armed conflict is covered by GCIII. In particular article 17 states that "
No
physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be
inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any
kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be
threatened, insulted or exposed to unpleasant or disadvantageous
treatment of any kind.".
GCIII POW status has far fewer exemptions than "Protected Person"
status under GCIV. If a person is an enemy combatant in an
international armed conflict, then they will have the protection of
GCIII and be entitled to be regarded as POWs under GCIII unless they are
an unlawful combatant. If there is a question of whether the combatant
is an unlawful combatant, they must be treated as POW's "until their
status has been determined by a competent tribunal" (GCIII article 5).
If the tribunal decides that they are an unlawful combatant, and they
are a Protected Person under GCIV, they will still have the some
protections under GCIV Article 5. They must be "
treated with humanity
and, in case of trial [for war crimes], shall not be deprived of the
rights of fair and regular trial prescribed by the present Convention".
A person, who is found guilty of war crimes in an international
armed conflict, or is not protected by GCIV because of some other
exemption, is no longer protected by the Geneva Conventions.